Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmp6cZBk7/tpa10.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)
F(s(x), s(y)) → MAX(s(x), s(y))
MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)
F(s(x), s(y)) → F(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))
MAX(s(x), s(y)) → MAX(x, y)
F(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(s(x), s(y))
F(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y)))
F(s(x), s(y)) → *¹(s(x), s(y))
+¹(s(x), y) → +¹(x, y)
*¹(x, s(y)) → *¹(x, y)
*¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, *(x, y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)
F(s(x), s(y)) → MAX(s(x), s(y))
MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)
F(s(x), s(y)) → F(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))
MAX(s(x), s(y)) → MAX(x, y)
F(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(s(x), s(y))
F(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y)))
F(s(x), s(y)) → *¹(s(x), s(y))
+¹(s(x), y) → +¹(x, y)
*¹(x, s(y)) → *¹(x, y)
*¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, *(x, y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 6 SCCs with 5 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

-¹(s(x), s(y)) → -¹(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(-¹(x₁, x₂)) = (3)x_2
POL(s(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 12.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+¹(s(x), y) → +¹(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

+¹(s(x), y) → +¹(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1
POL(+¹(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

*¹(x, s(y)) → *¹(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

*¹(x, s(y)) → *¹(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(*¹(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_2
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MAX(s(x), s(y)) → MAX(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MAX(s(x), s(y)) → MAX(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(s(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1
POL(MAX(x₁, x₂)) = (3)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 12.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MIN(s(x), s(y)) → MIN(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(MIN(x₁, x₂)) = (3)x_2
POL(s(x₁)) = 4 + (2)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 12.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(s(x), s(y)) → F(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

min(0, y) → 0
min(x, 0) → 0
min(s(x), s(y)) → s(min(x, y))
max(0, y) → y
max(x, 0) → x
max(s(x), s(y)) → s(max(x, y))
+(0, y) → y
+(s(x), y) → s(+(x, y))
-(x, 0) → x
-(s(x), s(y)) → -(x, y)
*(x, 0) → 0
*(x, s(y)) → +(x, *(x, y))
p(s(x)) → x
f(s(x), s(y)) → f(-(min(s(x), s(y)), max(s(x), s(y))), *(s(x), s(y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.